Mohit
The Patiala Residence court docket has listed the defamation case filed by Bollywood actor Nora Fatehi in opposition to actor Jacqueline Fernandez for hearing on January 21.
MUMBAI : The Patiala Residence court docket has listed the defamation case filed by Bollywood actor Nora Fatehi in opposition to actor Jacqueline Fernandez for hearing on January 21.
The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) of Patiala Residence court docket transferred the defamation case to Metropolitan Magistrate Kapil Gupta, who listed it for subsequent month.
On December 12, Nora had filed a defamation case in a court docket here in opposition to Jacqueline, alleging that the latter made defamatory allegations in opposition to her for “malicious reasons” and to homicide her occupation.
According to Nora, Jacqueline sought to criminally defame her in utter to homicide her occupation to extra her like interests, since they’re both working in the same commercial and like connected backgrounds, amongst diversified reasons.
Contending that her image is being tarnished, she, stressing that artistes’ occupation is fully based mostly on their standing, had alleged that defamatory remarks were made in opposition to her by Jacqueline to procure sure her financial, social, and personal downfall.
Within the complaint accessed by IANS, Nora had also claimed that Jacqueline has also maliciously attempted to absolve herself from her actions in a single more prison court docket cases that are completely unrelated to her.
“Jacqueline Fernandez will be an actress, and is truthful powerful identified in the film commercial. She has also been made an accused in the Sukesh Chandrashekhar Rs 200 crore money-laundering case by the Enforcement Directorate. That the defamatory imputations were made by Fernandez due to the malicious reasons. As antagonistic to that, Fernandez sought to criminally defame the complainant in utter to homicide her occupation to extra her like interests since she will be in Bollywood,” be taught the complaint moved by Nora thru her counsel suggest Vikram Chauhan.
Nora had extra alleged that Jacqueline made a false direct in opposition to her no topic being an actress too.
She “has unnecessarily dragged and defamed me as I’m in the same commercial. She is fully mindful that the commercial of any artiste and their occupation is fully based mostly on their standing. This clearly establishes that the said imputation has been made with the plot and recordsdata that such imputation will injure the standing of the complainant,” her plea be taught.
She had also accused about a media firms for quoting Jacqueline which diminished her standing in the same plea.
On December 2, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) had wondered Nora regarding conman Chandrashekhar’s money laundering case.
Both actresses had recorded their direct as watch in the case.
Earlier, mounted deposits worth Rs 7.2 crore belonging to Jacqueline were linked by the ED, which termed these gifts and properties as proceeds of crime obtained by the actress.
In February, the ED filed its first supplementary prosecution complaint in opposition to Chandrashekhar’s aide Pinky Irani, who launched him to Bollywood actresses.
It had been alleged in the payment sheet that Irani historical to purchase costly gifts for Jacqueline and later historical to plunge it at her dwelling after the funds were made by Chandrashekhar.
SOURCE-IANS
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings